Dispute over illegal probationary wage agreement at a Fujian-based technology company
Case Summary
Plaintiff Zhang joined Defendant Fujian [Company Name] Technology Co., Ltd. on 2024/1/1 as a Sales Specialist under a written labor contract with a term of 3 years and a probation period of 6 months. The agreed monthly salary after probation was 8000 yuan, and during probation it was 5000 yuan. After joining, Plaintiff discovered that the probationary wage set by Defendant fell below the statutory minimum. Plaintiff repeatedly requested compensation for the difference, but Defendant refused. On 2024/6/30, after successfully completing the probation period, Plaintiff filed a lawsuit requesting Defendant to pay the probationary wage difference of 14400 yuan for the period from 2024/1/1 to 2024/6/30.
Key Dispute
Case Strategy
Processing Result
The court ruled that Defendant Fujian [Name] Technology Co., Ltd. must pay Plaintiff Zhang the unpaid probationary wage difference of 14400 CNY for the period from 2024/1/1 to 2024/6/30, within 10 days of the judgment taking effect. Defendant shall bear all litigation costs in this case.
Encountering a similar legal issue?
Free AI case analysis: Get professional legal advice in 30 seconds to evaluate your case's chances of success and risks.
Recommended Related Cases
Dispute over double wage difference for failure to sign a labor contract by a technology company in Xiamen
The employer failed to execute a written labor contract with the employee. The employee sued for double wages, and the court ruled in favor of the employee.
Labor DisputeDispute over compensation for illegal termination of labor contract involving a trading company in Fujian
The company unilaterally terminated the employment contract without legal justification. The employee sued for compensation for unlawful termination, and the court ruled in favor of the employee.
Labor DisputeOvertime Pay Dispute Case Involving a Manufacturing Company in Xiamen
The company failed to fully pay overtime wages to the employee. The employee sued for the unpaid overtime, and the court ruled in their favor.