Return Case Listcontractual equity

Equity Pledge Dispute Involving Shareholders of a Technology Company in Fujian

Case Summary

Plaintiff Wang and Defendant Chen entered into a "Loan Agreement" whereby Defendant Chen borrowed 150 ten thousand yuan from Plaintiff for a term of 6 months at a monthly interest rate of 2%. Additionally, the parties executed an "Equity Pledge Contract," under which Defendant Chen pledged 30% of its equity in Xiamen Certain Technology Co., Ltd. as security for the loan. The contract stipulated that both parties would complete the equity pledge registration with the relevant industrial and commercial authority within 10 days after signing. Following execution of the agreement, Plaintiff disbursed 150 ten thousand yuan to Defendant Chen as agreed; however, Defendant Chen failed to complete the required equity pledge registration. Upon maturity of the loan term, Defendant Chen did not repay the principal and interest. Consequently, Plaintiff filed suit requesting repayment of the principal and interest by Defendant Chen and asserted priority rights of compensation over the pledged 30% equity held by Defendant Chen.

Key Dispute

1.Is the "Equity Pledge Contract" signed by both parties legal and valid?
2.Has the pledge right been established if the equity pledge has not been registered with the industrial and commercial administration?
3.Does the plaintiff's claim for priority repayment from the pledged equity comply with legal provisions?

Case Strategy

1.Secure core evidence including the Fixed Loan Agreement, Share Equity Pledge Agreement, loan payment vouchers, company registration records, and communication logs between both parties.
2.Produce evidence that the "Loan Agreement" and "Equity Pledge Contract" signed by both parties reflect their true intentions, do not violate mandatory provisions of laws or administrative regulations, and are legal and valid.
3.Prove that Defendant Chen failed to complete the industrial and commercial registration formalities for equity pledge as agreed. Pursuant to the Civil Code, a pledge right over equity is established only upon completion of the pledge registration. In this case, since no such registration was filed, the pledge right has not been established.
4.举证证明原告主张对质押股权享有优先受偿权,因质权未设立,法院不予支持,但原告可依据《股权质押合同》,要求被告陈某承担违约责任,赔偿原告的损失。

Processing Result

The court orders Defendant Chen to repay the Plaintiff Wang a principal amount of 150 ten thousand yuan, plus interest calculated at a monthly rate of 2% on a base of 150 ten thousand yuan, from the date of borrowing until the date of full payment, within ten days of the effective date of this judgment. The court dismisses the Plaintiff's claim for priority compensation rights over the 30% equity stake in Xiamen Certain Technology Co., Ltd. pledged by Defendant Chen. All litigation and preservation fees for this case shall be borne by the Defendant.

C

Fujian Ciji Law Firm

Compassion is the ocean; charity is the boat.

Deeply rooted in Fujian's commercial legal services, we provide professional, efficient, and practical solutions to build a robust legal shield for businesses and individuals.

Contact Us

  • Room 1901, Brain Tree Tech Building, No. 76 Hubin South Road, Kaiyuan Subdistrict, Siming District, Xiamen City, Fujian Province
  • Lawyer He 18059253980
  • Attorney Lin 15980761745
  • Lawyer He: fjcj18506957348

    Lawyer Lin: linlaw2024

Office Hours

Business days 9:00-18:00

For urgent inquiries, please call. We will respond as soon as possible outside of business hours.

Schedule Consultation

© 2026 Fujian Ciji Law Firm. All rights reserved.