Contract Dispute Between an Advertising Company in Xiamen and a Client
Case Summary
The Plaintiff, a certain advertising company in Xiamen, entered into an "Advertising Placement Service Contract" with the Defendant, a certain brand management company in Fujian. The contract stipulated that the Plaintiff would provide advertising placement services for subway and bus media in the Xiamen region, with a total contract value of 86 ten thousand yuan and a service period of 3 months. The Plaintiff fulfilled all advertising placement obligations as agreed and submitted comprehensive placement reports and monitoring data. However, the Defendant refused to pay the remaining 56 ten thousand yuan, having paid only 30 ten thousand yuan, citing unmet expectations regarding brand exposure and conversion rates post-placement. Consequently, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant, demanding payment of the outstanding service fees and liquidated damages.
Key Dispute
Case Strategy
Processing Result
The court ruled that the defendant shall pay the plaintiff the outstanding service fees of 56 ten thousand yuan, and liquidated damages for late payment calculated at a rate of 0.05% per day on the principal amount of 56 ten thousand yuan (from the due date of the service fees until the date of actual payment in full); the defendant shall bear all litigation costs incurred in this case.
Encountering a similar legal issue?
Free AI case analysis: Get professional legal advice in 30 seconds to evaluate your case's chances of success and risks.
Recommended Related Cases
Sales and purchase contract dispute between a technology company in Xiamen and its supplier
The supplier failed to deliver customized equipment on time, delaying the tech company's production line launch. The court ruled that the supplier must compensate for all economic losses.
Commercial DisputesFranchise Contract Dispute Between a Catering Company in Fujian and a Franchisee
The franchisee used raw materials not designated by the franchisor without authorization, breaching the franchise agreement. The court ruled that the franchisee is liable for breach of contract, and the franchisor has the right to terminate the agreement.
Commercial DisputesConstruction Contract Dispute Case Between a Xiamen Construction Company and the Project Owner
The employer refused to pay the construction contract price, citing quality issues. After judicial appraisal confirmed the work met quality standards, the court ruled that the employer must pay the full outstanding amount plus overdue interest.
