Labor Dispatch Contract Dispute Between a Human Resources Company in Xiamen and a Client
Case Summary
Plaintiff Xiamen [Name] HR Service Co., Ltd. and Defendant Fujian [Name] Manufacturing Enterprise entered into a "Labor Dispatch Service Contract," under which the Plaintiff agreed to provide labor dispatch services by sending frontline production workers to the Defendant's workshop. The Defendant was obligated to pay the Plaintiff a service fee of 150 yuan per employee per month, settled monthly. In accordance with the contract and the Defendant's job requirements, the Plaintiff dispatched qualified employees. After using these employees for 3 months, the Defendant refused to pay the service fees for 3 months totaling 18 ten thousand yuan, citing that some employees did not meet job requirements and had low work efficiency. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant, demanding payment of the outstanding service fees and liquidated damages.
Key Dispute
Case Strategy
Processing Result
The court ruled that the defendant shall pay the plaintiff the outstanding labor dispatch service fee of 18 ten thousand yuan, plus overdue payment interest calculated on the principal amount of 18 ten thousand yuan at the loan prime rate published by the National Interbank Funding Center from the due date of the service fee until the date of actual payment. The defendant shall bear all litigation costs for this case.
Encountering a similar legal issue?
Free AI case analysis: Get professional legal advice in 30 seconds to evaluate your case's chances of success and risks.
Recommended Related Cases
Sales and purchase contract dispute between a technology company in Xiamen and its supplier
The supplier failed to deliver customized equipment on time, delaying the tech company's production line launch. The court ruled that the supplier must compensate for all economic losses.
Commercial DisputesFranchise Contract Dispute Between a Catering Company in Fujian and a Franchisee
The franchisee used raw materials not designated by the franchisor without authorization, breaching the franchise agreement. The court ruled that the franchisee is liable for breach of contract, and the franchisor has the right to terminate the agreement.
Commercial DisputesConstruction Contract Dispute Case Between a Xiamen Construction Company and the Project Owner
The employer refused to pay the construction contract price, citing quality issues. After judicial appraisal confirmed the work met quality standards, the court ruled that the employer must pay the full outstanding amount plus overdue interest.
